From E-Mail Bag

Dr. Charles Krauthammer

Dr. Krauthammer is on Fox News. He is an M.D. and a lawyer and is paralyzed from the neck down. A friend went to hear Charles Krauthammer. He listened with 25 others in a closed room. What he says here, is NOT 2nd-hand but 1st. The ramifications are staggering for us, our children and their children.

Last Monday was a profound evening, Dr. Charles Krauthammer spoke to the Center for the American Experiment. He is a brilliant intellectual, seasoned & articulate. He is forthright and careful in his analysis, and never resorts to emotions or personal insults. He is NOT a fear monger nor an extremist in his comments and views. He is a fiscal conservative, and has received a Pulitzer Prize for writing. He is a frequent contributor to Fox News and writes weekly for the Washington Post.
The entire room was held spellbound during his talk. I have summarized his comments, as we are living in uncharted waters economically and internationally.

Even 2 Dems at my table agreed with everything he said! If you feel like forwarding this to those who are open minded and have not drunk the Kool-Aid, feel free.

Summary of his comments:

1. Mr. Obama is a very intellectual, charming individual. He is not to be underestimated. He is a cool customer who doesn't show his emotions. It's very hard to know what's behind the mask. The taking down of the Clinton dynasty was an amazing accomplishment. The Clintons still do not understand what hit them. Obama was in the perfect place at the perfect time.

2. Obama has political skills comparable to Reagan and Clinton. He has a way of making you think he's on your side, agreeing with your position, while doing the opposite. Pay no attention to what he SAYS; rather, watch what he DOES!

3. Obama has a ruthless quest for power. He did not come to Washington to make something out of himself, but rather to change everything, including dismantling capitalism. He can't be straightforward on his ambitions, as the public would not go along.
He has a heavy hand, and wants to level the playing field with income redistribution and punishment to the achievers of society. He would like to model the USA to Great Britain or Canada.

4. His three main goals are to control ENERGY, PUBLIC EDUCATION, and NATIONAL HEALTHCARE by the Federal government. He doesn't care about the auto or financial services industries, but got them as an early bonus. The cap and trade will add costs to everything and stifle growth. Paying for FREE college education is his goal. Most scary is his healthcare program, because if you make it FREE and add 46,000,000 people to a Medicare-type single-payer system, the costs will go through the roof. The only way to control costs is with massive RATIONING of services, like in Canada. God forbid!

5. He has surrounded himself with mostly far-left academic types. No one around him has ever even run a candy store. But they are going to try and run the auto, financial, banking and other industries. This obviously can't work in the long run. Obama is not a socialist; rather he's a far-left secular progressive bent on nothing short of revolution. He ran as a moderate, but will govern from the hard left. Again, watch what he does, not what he says.

6. Obama doesn't really see himself as President of the United States, but more as a ruler over the world. He sees himself above it all, trying to orchestrate & coordinate various countries and their
agendas. He sees moral equivalency in all cultures. His apology tour in Germany and England was a prime example of how he sees America, as an imperialist nation that has been arrogant, rather than a great noble nation that has at times made errors. This is the first President ever who has chastised our allies and appeased our enemies!

7. He is now handing out goodies. He hopes that the bill (and pain) will not come due until after he is reelected in 2012. He would like to blame all problems on Bush from the past, and hopefully his successor in the future. He has a huge ego, and Dr. Krauthammer believes he is a narcissist.

8. Republicans are in the wilderness for a while, but will emerge strong. Republicans are pining for another Reagan, but there will never be another like him. Krauthammer believes Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty & Bobby Jindahl (except for his terrible speech in February) are the future of the party. Newt Gingrich is brilliant, but has baggage. Sarah Palin is sincere and intelligent, but needs to really be seriously boning up on facts and info if she is to be a serious candidate in the future. We need to return to the party of lower taxes, smaller government, personal responsibility, strong national defense, and state's rights.

9. The current level of spending is irresponsible and outrageous. We are spending trillions that we don't have. This could lead to hyperinflation, depression or worse. No country has ever spent themselves into prosperity. The media is giving Obama, Reid and Pelosi a pass because they love their agenda. But eventually the bill will come due and people will realize the huge bailouts didn't work, nor will the stimulus package. These were trillion-dollar payoffs to Obama's allies, unions and the Congress to placate the left, so he can get support for #4 above.

10. The election was over in mid-September when Lehman brothers failed, fear and panic swept in, we had an unpopular President, and the war was grinding on indefinitely without a clear outcome. The people are in pain, and the mantra of change caused people to act emotionally. Any Dem would have won this election; it was surprising it was as close as it was.

11. In 2012, if the unemployment rate is over 10%, Republicans will be swept back into power. If it's under 8%, the Dems continue to roll. If it's between 8-10%, it will be a dogfight. It will all be about the economy. I hope this gets you really thinking about what's
happening in Washington and Congress. There is a left-wing revolution going on, according to Krauthammer, and he encourages us to keep the faith and join the loyal resistance. The work will be hard, but we're right on most issues and can reclaim our country, before it's far too late.

Do yourself a long term favor, send this to all who will listen to an intelligent assessment of the big picture. All our futures and children's futures depend on our good understanding of what is really going on in DC, and our action pursuant to that understanding!! It really IS up to each of us to take individual action!! Start with educating your friends and neighbors!!!

Two Pages of Reid's Bill Written to Offer a Bribe

ABCNews:

Jonathan Karl reports:

What does it take to get a wavering senator to vote for health care reform?

Here’s a case study.

On page 432 of the Reid bill, there is a section increasing federal Medicaid subsidies for “certain states recovering from a major disaster.”

The section spends two pages defining which “states” would qualify, saying, among other things, that it would be states that “during the preceding 7 fiscal years” have been declared a “major disaster area.”

I am told the section applies to exactly one state: Louisiana, the home of moderate Democrat Mary Landrieu, who has been playing hard to get on the health care bill.

In other words, the bill spends two pages describing would could be written with a single world: Louisiana. (This may also help explain why the bill is long.)

Senator Harry Reid, who drafted the bill, cannot pass it without the support of Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu.

How much does it cost? According to the Congressional Budget Office: $100 million.

Here’s the incredibly complicated language:

SEC. 2006. SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT TO FMAP DETERMINATION FOR CERTAIN STATES RECOVERING FROM A MAJOR DISASTER.

Section 1905 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d), as amended by sections 2001(a)(3) and
2001(b)(2), is amended— (1) in subsection (b), in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘subsection (y)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (y) and (aa)’’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:

‘‘(aa)(1) Notwithstanding subsection (b), beginning January 1, 2011, the Federal medical assistance percentage for a fiscal year for a disaster-recovery FMAP adjustment State shall be equal to the following:
‘(A) In the case of the first fiscal year (or part of a fiscal year) for which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), increased by 50 percent of the number of percentage points by which the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the preceding fiscal year after the application of only subsection (a) of section 5001 of Public Law 111–5 (if applicable to the preceding fiscal year) and without regard to this subsection, subsection (y), and subsections (b) and (c) of section 5001 of Public Law 111–5.

‘‘(B) In the case of the second or any succeeding fiscal year for which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the preceding fiscal year under this subsection for the State, increased by 25 percent of the number of percentage points by which the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the preceding fiscal year under this subsection.

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘disaster-recovery FMAP adjustment State’ means a State that is one of
the 50 States or the District of Columbia, for which, at any time during the preceding 7 fiscal years, the President has declared a major disaster under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act and determined as a result of such disaster that every county or parish in the State warrant individual and public assistance or public assistance from the Federal Government under such Act and for which— ‘‘(A) in the case of the first fiscal year (or part of a fiscal year) for which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the preceding fiscal year after the application of only subsection (a) of section 5001 of Public Law 111–5 (if applicable to the preceding fiscal year) and without regard to this subsection, subsection (y), and subsections (b) and (c) of section 5001 of Public Law 111–5, by at least 3 percentage points; and ‘‘(B) in the case of the second or any succeeding fiscal year for which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the preceding fiscal year under this subsection by at least 3 percentage points.

‘‘(3) The Federal medical assistance percentage determined for a disaster-recovery FMAP adjustment State under paragraph (1) shall apply for purposes of this title (other than with respect to disproportionate share hospital payments described in section 1923 and payments under this title that are based on the enhanced FMAP described in 2105(b)) and shall not apply with respect to payments under title IV (other than under part E of title IV) or payments under title XXI.’’.

Sara Palin: Alleged Fort Hood Shooter Should Have Been Profiled

Just plain old-fashioned common sense Sara. I guess that's why the libs hate you so much.

After the so-called investigations are finished of how Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was able to continue his Army career up until the point he slaughtered American soldiers despite his incompetence and overt jihadist proclivity, no matter what is identifed as the failure(s), it won't be the truth.

The truth which won't be reported is that he was not removed for his incompetence because he was Muslim. The counterintellience function was alerted by his behavior and he was 'flagged' accordingly, but nothing was done...because he was a Muslim.

Army and intelligence officials watching this scumbag were intimidated by the elitist, multiculturist, politically correct idiots running this country right now and if anyone would have taken any action against this guy they would have been hung out to dry, no matter the evidence. That, my friends is how the slaughter of GIs at their own base came to pass and nothing will change to stop this from happening again.

And read Daniel Pipes outstanding analysis here.

One last point. Why is every GI on every military base, foreign and domestic not armed with a loaded weapon at all times? Can people trained for combat not be trusted with a weapon? Instant responders beat first responders to the scene every time. How many GIs could Hasan have shot if they were all armed? Answer....none, he never would have tried it.

US News and World Report:

Sarah Palin tells Fox News Channel's Sean Hannity that she thinks the Fort Hood slayings of 13 soldiers was an act of terrorism and that the alleged shooter, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, should have been profiled. "I am going to use the word—profile this guy, profile in the sense of finding out what his radical believes were," she tells the host in an interview airing tonight at 9 p.m.

In the wide-ranging interview, highlighted below, Palin says she realizes that her support of profiling will lead liberals to bash her. "But I say profiling in the context of doing whatever we can to save innocent American lives. I'm all for it then."

Palin is promoting her 2008 campaign book, Going Rogue, which many see as a prelude to a 2012 presidential campaign. With Hannity, she didn't shut the door, and in fact she joked that her critics, like TV's Tina Fey, should plan on having some good material for a very long time.

"You're going to hear a lot from me," said Palin, who said she'd like to help causes dedicated to kids with special needs. And, she added, "the haters are going to have a whole lot of material. Tina Fey, she may have a whole lot of material coming up."

Global Warming Causes Whoring

OMG, there must be lead in the water, the world has lost it's mind. The mental disease called liberalism has gone into virulent overdrive.

GMANewsTV:

Effects of climate change have driven women in communities in coastal areas in poor countries like the Philippines to risk dangerous jobs, and sometimes even into the flesh trade.

Suneeta Mukherjee, country representative of the United Nations Food Population Fund (UNFPA), said women in the Philippines are the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change in the country.

“Climate change could reduce income from farming and fishing possibly driving some women into sex work and thereby increase HIV infection," Mukherjee said during the Wednesday launch of the UNFPA annual State of World Population Report in Pasay City.

In the Philippines, small brothels usually pop out near the coastal areas where many women do sexual services to transient seafarers. Often, these prostitutes are ferried to bigger ships by their pimps.

Based on the UNFPA report, there are 92 million Filipinos in the country as of 2009 and that number is expected to balloon to more than 146 million in the next 40 years.

Of the 92 million Filipinos, about 60 percent are living in coastal areas and depend on the seas for livelihood, said former Environment secretary Dr. Angel Alcala.

Alcala said that “we have already exceeded the carrying capacity of our marine environment."

But as the sea’s resources are depleted due to overpopulation and overfishing, fishermen start losing their livelihood and women are forced to share the traditional role of the man in providing for the family.

Alacala, who also heads the Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental Management in Siliman University, said some women often pick out shellfish by the coastlines, exposed to storm surges.

Women who could no longer endure this work often go out to find other jobs, while some are tempted into prostitution, Alcala added.

In an interview with the Inter Press News Agency, Marita Rodriguez of the Centre for Empowerment and Resource Development, Inc. said women are taking the brunt of climate change.

"Aside from their household chores and participation in fishing activity, they have to find additional sources of income like working as domestic helpers in affluent families," she said.

The UNFPA noted that the temperature in the earth’s surface has risen 0.74 degrees Celsius in the past 100 years. The 10 warmest years globally since 1880 have also been recorded in the last 13 years.

“Slower population growth, for example, would help build social resilience to climate change’s impacts and would contribute to a reduction of greenhouse gas-emissions in the future," the UNFPA report said.

The UNFPA suggested five measures to mitigate climate change and overpopulation:

• Bring a better understanding of population dynamics, gender and reproductive health to climate change and environmental discussions at all levels;
  
  
• Fully fund family planning services and contraceptive supplies within the framework of reproductive health and rights, and assure that low income is no barrier to access;
  
  
• Prioritize research and date collection to improve the understanding of gender and population dynamics in climate change mitigation and adaptation;
  
  
• Improve sex-disaggregation of date related to migration flows that are influenced by environmental factors and prepare now for increases in population movements resulting from climate change; and
  
  
• Integrate gender considerations into global efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change.

• 
  

Climatologists Baffled by Global Warming Time-Out

Most climatologists are baffled by common sense. Man made global warming, greenhouse gases...geez, what a bunch of kool-ade drinking, Al Gore idiots. It's the Sun stupid!

If you are so arrogant to believe mankind can affect global climate, start figuring out how to control the Sun and then come up with a new tax to fund it.

SpiegelOnLine:

Global warming appears to have stalled. Climatologists are puzzled as to why average global temperatures have stopped rising over the last 10 years. Some attribute the trend to a lack of sunspots, while others explain it through ocean currents.

At least the weather in Copenhagen is likely to be cooperating. The Danish Meteorological Institute predicts that temperatures in December, when the city will host the United Nations Climate Change Conference, will be one degree above the long-term average.

Otherwise, however, not much is happening with global warming at the moment. The Earth's average temperatures have stopped climbing since the beginning of the millennium, and it even looks as though global warming could come to a standstill this year.

Ironically, climate change appears to have stalled in the run-up to the upcoming world summit in the Danish capital, where thousands of politicians, bureaucrats, scientists, business leaders and environmental activists plan to negotiate a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Billions of euros are at stake in the negotiations.

Reached a Plateau

The planet's temperature curve rose sharply for almost 30 years, as global temperatures increased by an average of 0.7 degrees Celsius (1.25 degrees Fahrenheit) from the 1970s to the late 1990s. "At present, however, the warming is taking a break," confirms meteorologist Mojib Latif of the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences in the northern German city of Kiel. Latif, one of Germany's best-known climatologists, says that the temperature curve has reached a plateau. "There can be no argument about that," he says. "We have to face that fact."

Even though the temperature standstill probably has no effect on the long-term warming trend, it does raise doubts about the predictive value of climate models, and it is also a political issue. For months, climate change skeptics have been gloating over the findings on their Internet forums. This has prompted many a climatologist to treat the temperature data in public with a sense of shame, thereby damaging their own credibility.

"It cannot be denied that this is one of the hottest issues in the scientific community," says Jochem Marotzke, director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg. "We don't really know why this stagnation is taking place at this point."

Just a few weeks ago, Britain's Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research added more fuel to the fire with its latest calculations of global average temperatures. According to the Hadley figures, the world grew warmer by 0.07 degrees Celsius from 1999 to 2008 and not by the 0.2 degrees Celsius assumed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. And, say the British experts, when their figure is adjusted for two naturally occurring climate phenomena, El Niño and La Niña, the resulting temperature trend is reduced to 0.0 degrees Celsius -- in other words, a standstill.

The differences among individual regions of the world are considerable. In the Arctic, for example, temperatures rose by almost three degrees Celsius, which led to a dramatic melting of sea ice. At the same time, temperatures declined in large areas of North America, the western Pacific and the Arabian Peninsula. Europe, including Germany, remains slightly in positive warming territory.

Mixed Messages

But a few scientists simply refuse to believe the British calculations. "Warming has continued in the last few years," says Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK). However, Rahmstorf is more or less alone in his view. Hamburg Max Planck Institute scientist Jochem Marotzke, on the other hand, says: "I hardly know any colleagues who would deny that it hasn't gotten warmer in recent years."

The controversy sends confusing and mixed messages to the lay public. Why is there such a vigorous debate over climate change, even though it isn't getting warmer at the moment? And how can it be that scientists cannot even arrive at a consensus on changes in temperatures, even though temperatures are constantly being measured?

The global temperature-monitoring network consists of 517 weather stations. But each reading is only a tiny dot on the big world map, and it has to be extrapolated to the entire region with the help of supercomputers. Besides, there are still many blind spots, the largest being the Arctic, where there are only about 20 measuring stations to cover a vast area. Climatologists refer to the problem as the "Arctic hole."

The scientists at the Hadley Center simply used the global average value for the hole, ignoring the fact that it has become significantly warmer in the Arctic, says Rahmstorf. But a NASA team from the Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, which does make the kinds of adjustments for the Arctic data that Rahmstorf believes are necessary, arrives at a flat temperature curve for the last five years that is similar to that of their British colleagues.

Marotzke and Leibniz Institute meteorologist Mojib Latif are even convinced that the fuzzy computing done by Rahmstorf is counterproductive. "We have to explain to the public that greenhouse gases will not cause temperatures to keep rising from one record temperature to the next, but that they are still subject to natural fluctuations," says Latif. For this reason, he adds, it is dangerous to cite individual weather-related occurrences, such as a drought in Mali or a hurricane, as proof positive that climate change is already fully underway.

"Perhaps we suggested too strongly in the past that the development will continue going up along a simple, straight line. In reality, phases of stagnation or even cooling are completely normal," says Latif.

Obama's Alternative Reality

The same guy who has tripled the national debt during his first year in office, and is demanding of Congress health care and energy bills which will permanently cripple the economy is now cautioning us about rising deficits and inflation?

Either Obama is a very stupid man or he thinks we are.

And the national media sleeps on!

Reuters: BEIJING, Nov 18 (Reuters) - President Barack Obama gave his sternest warning yet about the need to contain rising U.S. deficits, saying on Wednesday that if government debt were to pile up too much, it could lead to a double-dip recession.

With the U.S. unemployment rate at 10.2 percent, Obama told Fox News his administration faces a delicate balance of trying to boost the economy and spur job creation while putting the economy on a path toward long-term deficit reduction.

His administration was considering ways to accelerate economic growth, with tax measures among the options to give companies incentives to hire, Obama said in the interview with Fox conducted in Beijing during his nine-day trip to Asia.

"It is important though to recognize if we keep on adding to the debt, even in the midst of this recovery, that at some point, people could lose confidence in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession," he said.

Fox News, which released a transcript of the interview, showed that comment by Obama on Wednesday morning and said the full discussion would be broadcast later in the day. (Reporting by Caren Bohan; Editing by John O'Callaghan)

Thanksgiving - A Celebration of Capitalism and Triumph Over Communism

Free Republic

Jane Fonda and Code Pink - Obama's Co-conspirators

Big Government:

Top Obama donor and fundraiser Jodie Evans met with the Taliban in Afghanistan on a recent trip there, according to a report by Jane Fonda of a discussion she had with Evans last month. The meeting with the Taliban took place just weeks before Evans was videotaped directly handing to President Barack Obama a package of information about her trip to Afghanistan at a high dollar fundraiser in San Francisco.

Jodie Evans and Jane Fonda, photo by Jane Halifax

The meeting with the Taliban was kept secret by Evans and her group Code Pink in reports she and the group posted from Kabul and in interviews with the media and bloggers about the trip. Fonda, a close friend of Evans, let the secret meeting slip in an account of her dinner with Evans at a fundraiser for the Armand Hammer Museum in Los Angeles:

Last Saturday, My dear friends Jodie Evans and Max Palevsky, invited Richard and me to join them at their table at a fundraiser at the Armand Hammer Museum in Westwood. It was a good evening for lots of reasons. I had never been to the museum and definitely want to go back. Clearly it is a courageous place, very cutting edge. Then, too, I saw lots of friends I hadn’t seen in a long time and I sat next to Jodie who told me a little about her recent trip to Afghanistan with an American delegation that included a retired colonel, and member the State Department (Army Reserves Col. (Ret.) and ex-diplomat Ann Wright). While there, she met with people ranging from the brother of President Karzai, Afghan members of Parliament, activists, to warlords and members of the Taliban (emphasis added.) Jodie is co-founder of the peace organization, Code Pink, and always willing to go to any lengths to try and find out what’s really going on. Bottom line: everyone she met with wants the U.S. Military out of their country. They feel our presence there has brought more violence rather than security. Please read a short article she wrote about the trip which is on the Women’s Media Center website.

There is precedent to suspect that Evans is acting as a conduit for the Taliban to Obama. In June, her fellow Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin hand carried a letter out of Gaza from the terrorist group Hamas addressed to Obama.

Over the seven years of its existence, Code Pink has acted as propaganda shills for the anti-American governments of Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez, Bolivia’s President Evo Morales, Cuba’s Castro brothers and Iraq under Saddam Hussein, as well as Middle Eastern terrorist groups.

Fonda has her own history of working with America’s enemies. During the Vietnam war she visited North Vietnam in 1972 and was photographed manning an anti-aircraft battery used to shoot down American planes. Fonda also recorded propaganda radio broadcasts for the North Vietnamese communists

In 2007 Code Pink brought Fonda out of protest retirement at a so-called antiwar demonstration held at the Navy Memorial in Washington, D.C.

What was in the package that Evans gave Obama at the San Francisco fundraiser? She describes what she gave Obama in an article at the Huffington Post:

…we were careful to make the package very user and security friendly. It was filled with photos, quotes, thousands of signatures (on a petition against more troops for Afghanistan), a copy of Rethink Afghanistan and our 25-minute interview with Afghan MP Dr. Roshanak Wardak from Wardak Province, who is adamant that the U.S. should not send new troops and rather, must leave.

Evans notes that she gave a similar package to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi who was also at the fundraiser being held in her city.

No mention is made by Evans on whether she relayed oral or written messages from the Taliban to Obama. However, it is a strong possibility given Fonda’s revelation and Code Pink’s history.

Code Pink’s image as kooky but well-meaning women committed to peace is belied by their words and actions. At home they work to undermine morale in our soldiers, their families and the American public. Abroad they work with terrorist enemies of the United States.

And one of Code Pink’s co-founders, Jodie Evans, works with President Obama. Is anyone in our nation’s capital paying attention?

Obama: 'Muslims Bring Justice to the World'

Enemies Within:

I hope I have you’re attention. If you don’t know who uttered these famous words, his initials are B.O. that is so appropriate considering the stench emanating from Washington. B.O. the man child, made this statement at Martha’s Vinyard celebrating what else? Ramadan, but he’s a Christian. A statement like this should not leave any doubt where BO’s sympathies reside. America, you better wrap your head around this, you have elected the enemy. Obama (in case you haven’t figured out who BO is) making a statement like this and all his subsequent statements and actions including the recent act of treason are indicative of an individual not having any pro American values. This myth in the Whitehouse is not an American, lack of a legitimate birth certificate not withstanding. Not sure what the act of treason is; it’s bringing KSM to New York for no other reason than to aid our enemies and put America (that would be all of you who believe in the defeat of terrorism) on trial. For you illiterate liberal mush minds who don’t know the definition of anything or the concept of reality, the definition treason is levying war against the U.S., or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. KSM is an enemy combatant, he is not a criminal, he is the mastermind of the terrorist attack against the U.S. on 9/11, he is not a U.S. citizen and despite all of these facts, our myth of a President, our Muslim President gives aid to our enemy by giving him full Constitutional rights and complete access to ALL of our intelligence.

I added a post here last week on Veterans Day about our dishonorable President and why he is dishonorable by presiding over a memorial service dedicated to the 13 killed by a terrorist during a terrorist act and never acknowledged it for what it was nor acknowledging their true commitment, the reason they joined the military and why they fought; the war on terror. Not happy with dishonoring them and showing his ugly mug for a photo-op pretending to care, he decides to stick it to our military some more by slapping them in the face, America in the face, and our intelligence community in the face by giving KSM a forum to spew his BS, then like the coward that he is, he leaves town. Part of that is not entirely true, BO decided to do this six months ago and he just decided to drop that bomb now.

So, back to his statement, “Muslims bring justice to world” would mean that the 9/11 attack was just, the 13 killed almost two weeks ago was just, the dithering on Afghanistan resulting in the highest number of deaths in a month for our military is just, and not being comfortable with victory is just. What more do you need to know about his allegiance? He is the enemy. His dozens of unconstitutional czars are the enemy. All those in his inner circle are the enemy. Again, you better wrap your head around this and understand the reality that Obama is not American, he does not believe in this country, he does not care about our military, and he does not care about your welfare or the security of this country.

$10,000 per Congressional Motors Car Sold

Obama and the UAW at work for you:

Fox Business:

Economist Thomas D Hopkins of the Rochester Institute of Technology will publish a study later today for the National Taxpayers Union that finds the cost of the auto bailout amounts to about $10,000 for every vehicle sold. We got an advanced look at the study, which says:

The federal government has distributed to the U.S. auto industry thus far some $80 billion of taxpayer funds since December 2008--about $800 per American taxpaying family....Virtually all of the money has gone to just three firms--General Motors, Chrysler and GMAC--with GM alone receiving over $50 billion.

Despite this gift of your money, the GAO says that the automakers’ survival as financially viable firms "remains unclear". Business Week reports that "the numbers have been shockingly bad" and Consumer Reports says of Chrysler, "we couldn't recommend any of its products in last year's survey because of mediocre performance, poor reliability, or both."

If GM and Chrysler do not survive past next year, says Hopkins:

the taxpayer bailout burden could amount to some $10,700 per 2009-10 vehicle sold.

That's more than a third of the average price of a new car. The only way for this burden to be lessened, Hopkins writes, is if GM and Chrysler somehow manage to survive without additional bailouts. But those prospects are bleak.

Now that we own GM and a piece of Chrysler, I think we'll find it difficult to get rid of them. Already, GMAC is asking for a third round of bailouts in the range of $2.8 - 5.6 billion. Sadly, this Saturday Night Live skit lampooning GM's bailout proposal may wind up close to the truth.

It's the Birth Certificate, Damn It

This is the broadcast that got Pastor James Manning a visit by Home Land Security. He apparently got a little too intemperate with some of his language, thus the visit, but he is entirely right that those who are concerned with what Obama and this Congress are doing to the nation should focus all energy and pressure in requiring Obama to prove his eligibility to hold the office of President with regard to his being a 'Natural Born Citizen'.

This single issue has the potential to stop and reverse the dangerous actions taken and being taken against the nation and people of the United States.

Large Labor Unions are Anti-American Communist Gangs

I concede workers need advocacy and protection from some employers, but unions such as the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), UAW, and Teamsters have a gang mentality and power agenda which supersedes their stated purpose of benevolent worker protection.

They make no attempt at partnership with their employers and do nothing to nurture the industries which provide employment for their members, if fact they function only as parasites, lowering productivity, driving up needless and unreasonable costs and drive jobs out of the United States.

Worse, they are thugs and criminals.

And they are not good neighbors either:

Local SEIU chief Nick Balzano told the Allentown City Council the union might file a grievance against the city for allowing Anderson to work on the project.

"We'll be looking into the Cub Scout or Boy Scout who did the trails," he told the council, the Morning Call reported.

Balzano later told the newspaper he isn't targeting Boy Scouts but argued no one but a union member should be allowed to pick up
a hoe or shovel, plant a flower or clear a path for the city.

"There's to be no volunteers," he said, according to the Morning Call.

In fact the SEIU is actively trying become your government.

Obama - 7 Lies in 2 Minutes

Political Image Marketing

We all remember the "Hillary Meal" --- Small breasts and big thighs.


Now, KFC has announced an addition to their chicken dinners.

It's called the Obama Cabinet Bucket.

It consists of nothing but left wings and a__holes.

A Most Profound Condemnation of Islam

Eric Holder Makes An Ass of Himself Before Congress

It's just not fair to confuse a liberal with common sense. Lindsey Graham should be ashamed of himself for tormenting an imbecile in public.

32% Tuition Inflation Causes Riot at UCLA

The World's Only Lying Teleprompter

Obama's Home Teleprompter Malfunctions During Family Dinner

Obama is Using Terrorists for His Own Agenda

There is absolutely no valid reason for Eric Holder to bring terrorists from GITMO to New York City and trying them in civilian court in lieu of a military tribunal and every reason not to do so.

The sole reason for doing so is to use this 'show' trial as a condemnation of the Bush Administration and is a political stunt at the expense of the of American people.

Obama Created Non-Existant Jobs in Non-Existant Places

Wow, even the Almighty Barack Campaign (ABC) Network is publishing some criticism of Obama. Can you imagine the Resident's poll numbers if the liberal media were really doing their job?

ABCNews:

Here's a stimulus success story: In Arizona's 15th congressional district, 30 jobs have been saved or created with just $761,420 in federal stimulus spending. At least that's what the Web site set up by the Obama administration to track the $787 billion stimulus says.

Discrepancies on government web site call into question stimulus spending.

There's one problem, though: There is no 15th congressional district in Arizona; the state has only eight districts.

And ABC News has found many more entries for projects like this in places that are incorrectly identified.

Late Monday, officials with the Recovery Board created to track the stimulus spending, said the mistakes in crediting nonexistent congressional districts were caused by human error.

"We report what the recipients submit to us," said Ed Pound, Communications Director for the Board.

Pound told ABC News the board receives declarations from the recipients - state governments, federal agencies and universities - of stimulus money about what program is being funded.

"Some recipients clearly don't know what congressional district they live in, so they appear to be just throwing in any number. We expected all along that recipients would make mistakes on their congressional districts, on jobs numbers, on award amounts, and so on. Human beings make mistakes," Pound said.

The issue has raised hackles on Capitol Hill.

Rep. David Obey, D-Wisc, who chairs the powerful House appropriations Committee, issued a paper statement demanding that the recovery.gov Web site be updated.

"The inaccuracies on recovery.gov that have come to light are outrageous and the Administration owes itself, the Congress, and every American a commitment to work night and day to correct the ludicrous mistakes."